JT Chasing America's 250th Book of the Week: Sam Baltrusis’s Ghosts of the American Revolution — When the Past Refuses to Stay Buried
Part history, part haunted travelogue, part folklore, and part paranormal field journal, Baltrusis’s book asks a wonderfully strange America 250 question: what happens when the places where the Revolution occurred refuse to feel finished?
There are many ways to enter the American Revolution. You can begin with Parliament. You can begin with Lexington. You can begin with the Declaration of Independence.
Sam Baltrusis begins with a ghost.
Published by Globe Pequot, the book is not a conventional military history, political history, or biography of the founding generation. It is something much stranger and, at its best, much more inviting: a journey through historic places where the Revolution is remembered not only through monuments, documents, and preserved buildings, but through legends of apparitions, unexplained footsteps, strange voices, residual energy, haunted burial grounds, and stories that have accumulated around the dead.
The ghosts are the hook. The history is what keeps the book interesting.
The Revolution as a Haunted Landscape
Baltrusis’s central subject is not really “Are ghosts real?” It is place. Again and again, the book asks what happens when modern people stand in locations where enormous things happened and realize that the landscape is still there.
Boston’s Old State House still stands above the ground where the Boston Massacre unfolded. Prospect Hill still overlooks the country around Somerville. Cambridge still contains burial grounds, churches, houses, and streets tied to the first chaotic months of the war. Manhattan still has the Morris-Jumel Mansion, Fraunces Tavern, St. Paul’s Chapel, and the geography of British occupation. Old houses still preserve rooms where Patriots and Loyalists slept, argued, waited, fled, or were displaced. Burial grounds still contain people whose lives touched the Revolution directly.
That physical continuity gives the book its best power. A monument can tell you that something happened. A surviving room can make you imagine somebody standing there.
Baltrusis spends much of the book living inside that difference, and this style alone makes this read a "can't put down" kind of book.
The result is historical tourism with an after-dark pulse.
A Book That Knows Exactly What Its Hook Is
The introduction opens with Baltrusis attending a reenactment of the Boston Massacre on its 250th anniversary (imagine how haunting this reenactment must feel on those sacred grounds!).
Instead of simply admiring the costumes and muskets, he becomes uncomfortable with the energy of the crowd. The reenactment makes him think about mob behavior, public violence, his previous work on the Salem witch trials, and the darker psychological continuity between communities celebrating resistance and communities capable of turning collective anger against human targets. That is a provocative opening because it refuses to treat Revolutionary violence as automatically noble simply because later generations know which side won and the stories that snowballed into a perhaps skewed history of things.
Baltrusis keeps returning to that tension. That same tension we have referred to in many of our other writings from this year's study while Chasing America's 250th.
The Revolution is patriotic memory.
But it is also blood. It is courage. It is fear, humiliation, imprisonment, confiscation, mob action, illness, displacement, and death.
For a ghost book, that is surprisingly useful territory. Haunting becomes a way of talking about unfinished memory.
Patriots, the Overlooked, and Loyalists
The organization of Ghosts of the American Revolution is one of the smartest and well put together things about it.
Baltrusis divides his principal character studies into three groups:
The Patriots.
The Overlooked.
The Loyalists.
The Patriot section includes Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, James Monroe, John Adams, and Paul Revere. Those are names most readers already know, of course. But Baltrusis does not stop there.
“The Overlooked” shifts toward Abigail Adams, Betsy Ross, Mary Washington, and Peter Salem. Then the Loyalist section deliberately crosses the line to Benedict Arnold, John Burgoyne, Sally Hutchinson, and Thomas Gage. That matters because a weaker paranormal-history book could easily become a parade of haunted Founding Fathers, which, sadly, has been the case for quite sometime before this gem of a book came along. This one at least attempts a wider memory map, a feat that is very deserving for such a time of hisory.
The Revolutionary dead are not arranged only according to who later became heroic.
People on the losing side had homes. They lost property. They fled communities. They were imprisoned. They died far from the lives they expected to have. If haunting stories are partly about memory refusing to disappear, Loyalists belong in that story just as much as Patriots do, if not in some horrifying ways even more so.
That is one reason the Peter Oliver House material works well. The property connects Revolutionary confiscation, Loyalism, local memory, preservation, and paranormal lore in the same physical place.
Come for the Haunts, Stay for the History
One of the people Baltrusis interviews describes a useful motto for paranormal work at historic sites: come for the haunts, stay for the history. That could serve as the unofficial thesis of the whole book. Ghost stories have always been unusually good at getting people through doors. Tell someone that an eighteenth-century house contains original paneling and period furniture, and some people will be interested. Tell them a woman in colonial clothing has reportedly been seen on the staircase, and suddenly they want to know who lived there.
Then the historical questions begin.
Who owned the house?
Why did they leave?
Whose side were they on?
Who took possession afterward?
Who died there?
What was the building used for during the war?
Where were the dead buried?
What happened to the servants, enslaved people, soldiers, prisoners, women, children, or displaced families connected to the site?
A good ghost story can therefore act as historical bait. That is not an insult. Anything that gets a reader asking better questions about the past has educational value.
Baltrusis understands that very clearly.
The Best Parts Are Often the Places, Not the Apparitions
The book becomes especially enjoyable when it moves through real historic landscapes. In Manhattan, Baltrusis uses haunted-site exploration to move through Revolutionary New York — the Morris-Jumel Mansion, Fraunces Tavern, St. Paul’s Chapel, the memory of British occupation, prison ships, battle sites, and the physical remains of a city that was one of the war’s most important military spaces. In Massachusetts, places around Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and the harbor become portals into the opening years of the Revolution, the Siege of Boston, prisoners, Loyalist properties, graves, fortifications, and old community tensions. That is where the book earns its place beside more conventional Revolution reading.
After reading about a haunting at a historic house, you are much more likely to remember the house. After reading about alleged residual activity at a fort, you remember that the fort existed. After following Baltrusis through a cemetery, the names on the stones stop being abstract.
That may sound simple, but memory works that way. We remember stories attached to places. Baltrusis gives the places stories.
The Book Is More Skeptical Than Its Title Might Suggest
A useful surprise is that Ghosts of the American Revolution occasionally contains its own caution against paranormal overconfidence. One investigator interviewed in the book warns that when someone goes looking specifically for the ghost of George Washington or Benjamin Franklin, any unexplained response can too easily be assigned to the famous person the investigator hoped to find.
Baltrusis also discusses the problem of “contamination” during investigations — wind, noise, temperature fluctuations, building conditions, other people, and environmental factors capable of generating false positives. That skepticism improves the book.
It gives the reader permission to enjoy the stories without pretending that every story has been proven. Read the book with that distinction intact and it becomes much better. You do not have to believe every haunting to appreciate what the haunting story reveals about what a community remembers, what it fears, what it romanticizes, and which dead it refuses to forget.
Historic Sites Have Good Reason to Be Careful
Baltrusis also addresses a real tension between paranormal tourism and historical preservation.
Some historic sites do not want to become known primarily as “the haunted place.”
That concern makes sense.
A serious museum can spend decades researching architecture, ownership, labor, slavery, political history, archaeology, material culture, and preservation — only to discover that visitors want to know whether a woman in white appears in the attic. There are also legitimate concerns about sensationalism, bad history, damage, vandalism, disrespect toward the dead, and investigators repeating legends without checking whether the underlying story is even true. Baltrusis includes voices from the preservation world who raise exactly those problems. That makes the book stronger because it acknowledges that haunted history can either deepen public interest or flatten a historic site into an attraction.
The difference is research. The best haunted history makes someone care enough to learn what really happened.
The Revolution Looks Different When the Dead Include the Losing Side
The Loyalist material deserves special attention. American Revolutionary memory has traditionally had an obvious problem: it knows how the story ends. Because independence succeeded, Patriot choices can appear inevitable and Loyalist choices can appear foolish, cowardly, or morally suspect. People living in the 1770s did not know the ending.
Some believed resistance had gone too far. Some believed loyalty to the Crown offered stability. Some feared mob violence. Some depended economically or socially on imperial networks. Some simply wanted to survive. And some were punished, displaced, or stripped of property when the Patriot cause triumphed locally.
A ghost-story format is surprisingly compatible with that history because ghosts are, almost by definition, figures who do not fit comfortably into the official ending. That makes the Loyalist section more than a spooky detour. It is a reminder that revolutions create people who belong to the same geography but not to the victorious national mythology.
The Overlooked Section Matters for the Same Reason
Baltrusis also gives space to figures who sit outside the standard parade of presidents and generals. Peter Salem is especially important in that respect. The Revolution was never experienced only by elite white men. Women sustained households, political networks, economies, correspondence, farms, businesses, and wartime communities. Black Patriots fought in the conflict while slavery remained embedded in American society. Enslaved people pursued freedom through multiple strategies and allegiances. The modern field goes far beyond what this paranormal book attempts to cover, but the decision to create a section called “The Overlooked” is still meaningful.
It tells readers that the famous dead are not the only dead worth remembering. That is exactly the kind of instinct America’s 250th needs more of.
A Ghost Book Can Still Be a History Gateway
Nobody should use Ghosts of the American Revolution as a substitute for a serious modern history of the Revolution. That is not what it was written to be. Read Bailyn for ideology. Read Wood for republican transformation. Read Maier for resistance and radicalization. Read Taylor, DuVal, Calloway, Nash, Jasanoff, Holton, and others for the continental, Indigenous, social, racial, Loyalist, and popular dimensions of the conflict. Then let Baltrusis do something those books are not trying to do.
Let him make you want to visit the building. Let him make you look twice at the cemetery. Let him send you searching for the actual history behind the legend. Let him make a place feel inhabited.
Why It Belongs in Chasing America’s 250th
The 250th anniversary of the United States is going to produce a mountain of polished memory.
Flags. Reenactments. Ceremonies. Historic speeches. Founders. Battle anniversaries. All of that has a place. But anniversaries are also opportunities to ask what survives underneath the official story. Folklore is part of that survival. So are ghost stories.
Whether one believes a reported apparition is genuinely supernatural, psychologically generated, environmentally produced, culturally inherited, or simply a good story repeated for generations, the story itself becomes part of the history of how people remember a place. That is what Ghosts of the American Revolution contributes to this series.
What does the Revolution feel like when you walk through the places where it happened after dark?
Which names remain attached to rooms, roads, graves, forts, taverns, churches, mansions, and battlefields?
Which stories refuse to disappear?
And what can those stories send us back to discover?
Those are worthwhile questions. Ghosts of the American Revolution is easiest to enjoy when you allow it to be exactly what it is. A haunted-history travelogue written by a paranormal researcher who uses reported hauntings, personal experiences, interviews, historic sites, local legends, and Revolutionary history to explore the strange afterlife of America’s founding era.
The dead do not need to walk through walls for the past to haunt a place, just stand in any great historic space for a moment, really still. A confiscated house can be haunted by what happened to the family that lost it. A prison site can be haunted by suffering even when no apparition appears. A battlefield can feel different once you know who died there. A burial ground can become crowded with stories long before anybody produces an EVP.
History itself is a form of lingering. Baltrusis simply takes that idea more literally than most historians would.
For readers who love the Revolution, historic places, folklore, strange stories, old cemeteries, haunted houses, or the uneasy border between documented history and legend, Ghosts of the American Revolution is an extremely fun side road through the founding era.
Come for the ghosts.
Stay because the places and their histories were real.
That makes Sam Baltrusis’s Ghosts of the American Revolution a perfect choice for this week’s Chasing America’s 250th Book of the Week.
Book Details
Author: Sam Baltrusis
Title: Ghosts of the American Revolution
Publisher: Globe Pequot Publishing
Official Publisher Release Date: November 15, 2021
Print Length: 214 pages
Best For: Readers of American Revolution history, haunted history, folklore, historic-site travel, paranormal investigation, local history, and anyone who likes history with a darker edge
Reading Level: Accessible general-audience nonfiction
Selected Sources
Ghosts of the American Revolution — supplied digital edition
Official publisher page — Simon & Schuster / Globe Pequot
Google Books bibliographic record
Comments